Bankruptcy - discharge and proofs of debt

Three interesting procedural points relating to the bankruptcy of individuals arose in Law Society v Dixit Shah [2007] EWHC 2841 (Ch), where recovery was sought from bankrupt solicitors' professional indemnity insurers.

  1. Discharge of a bankrupt merely extinguishes a creditor's remedy of enforcement, not the underlying cause of action.
  2. The court can accept or reject a proof of debt (under its general jurisdiction from Section 363 of the Insolvency Acy 1986) without the trustee having considered the matter first.
  3. A proof may be admitted or rejected for reasons other than determining a right to vote or participate in a dividend, where the proof of debt procedure is directed to satisfying the claim of a legitimate creditor (here, through the Third Party (Rights against Insurers) Act 1930) without any possible harm to any other creditor.

Floyd J appeared determined to ensure that legal technicalities should not prevent the third party claimants being able to recover from the insurers. Read the judgment (link above) for more detail.

Re: Lune Metal Products Limited (in administration)

The Court of Appeal's judgement given by Lord Justice Neuberger in Re: Lune Metal Products Limited (in administration), [2006] EWCA Civ 1720, is a delightful model of clarity of thought and expression and is worth reading for that alone.

The point of the case is short. The administrators in a pre-Enterprise Act administration may obtain the court's sanction to make a distribution to creditors only if the distribution is a condition of their discharge.

I am grateful for my attention being drawn to the case by Upload-Finance.